Massachusetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drawn up a framework for the regulation of DFS into the Bay State.

Massachusetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drawn up a framework for the regulation of DFS into the Bay State.

Massach<span id="more-20022"></span>usetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drawn up a framework for the regulation of DFS into the Bay State.

The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing modernization that is sweeping and has formally stated its intent to consider online ticket product sales, also offering its very own daily dream sports and social video gaming services and products.

Massachusetts happens to be making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for a while, since it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with a more up-to-date and competitive online offering.

While Internet casino video gaming and poker would demand a huge legislative upheaval, DFS and social video gaming wouldn’t normally ( at the least within the Bay State), plus it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating its own fantasy sports item as an easy method attractive to the younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of newer, mobile-friendly styles.

Formal Invitation

As a result, the state has launched a formal request information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, operational support, and maintenance of the Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read an official statement.

This would include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and lottery that is new, including but not restricted to social gaming and daily dream sports options.’

Of particular interest to the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, also as recommendations for responsible gaming controls.

The commission also states that it is searching for ways of integrating lottery ticket stores in order to protect the 7,500-odd small enterprises that depend on lottery sales commissions.

Homegrown Product

‘We believe the introduction of a fantasy recreations platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace a market that is emerging continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the Information Service recently.

‘ This type that is particular of would not cannibalize our existing products. It could obviously be a product that is new. It might help us to interact what we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also help Lottery to create a revenue that is new compared to eroding or keeping existing offers.’

Across the border in nyc State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman happens to be railing up against the ‘fraudulent’ nature of this DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared that there are no federal or state legislation that preclude such sites from operating.

Healy has proposed complete regulation of DFS, drawing up protocols to protect customers, and has said that state residents who play DFS should ‘not be concerned’ which they are breaking the law.

Most likely, there’s nothing incorrect with embracing a little local innovation, and DraftKings, created and bred in Boston, is maybe benefitting from being a success story that is homegrown.

India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting

Previous India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the country legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)

Asia is one step closer to legalizing recreations betting and gambling after a panel appointed by the country’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the gaming that is longstanding in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.

Home to over 1.2 billion people, India is the second-most country that is populated the world.

Now three lawmakers, former Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to your Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized activities gambling would provide more transparency and reduce rogue backdoor wagering.

‘It [betting] would provide both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told reporters on adding that the market should be opened, but only with extensive safeguards in place to ensure that players and those with direct ties to sports matches are barred from participating monday.

2013 Scandal

Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as chairman, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.

The events of 2013 were unprecedented though the sport of cricket is no stranger to controversy.

The investigation that is lengthy Delhi Police led to charges against 39 individuals and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.

The match-fixing that is widespread illegal wagering led the BCCI to make a plan to improve its infrastructure and look for ways to mend its moral standing.

The unlawful acts also led to intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to eradicate illegal betting systems and properly monitor players and officials.

BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision

Cricket is the absolute most popular activity in India, and while the game’s governing body claims it wants to clean its league up, the federal government might not be so wanting to ending gambling prohibition.

Apart from horse racing, gambling in Asia is illegal for nearly 150 years.

In addition to proposing legal cricket gambling, Lodha’s outline also indicates changing the BCCI’s energy framework and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report to date.

The decision to authorize gaming and sports betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on their state and levels that are federal.

‘ The federal government will likely keep it alone since it remains a contentious issue,’ India Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.

Gambling has mostly been a states’ rights topic over the full years, but of the country’s 29 states and seven territories, just three have taken actions to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.

Though gambling can provide substantial revenues and monies for local governments, many in India think any expansion of gambling additionally leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and cash laundering.

Lodha argues gambling’s already there, albeit illegally, and that swift action needs to be taken.

‘With big money and attention, there has not been the caution that is necessary protect the activity and its particular players from the orgy of excess,’ he stated.

2nd PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After Very First Effort Fizzled

Ike Haxton, who resigned on New Year’s Day as a PokerStars professional in protest at the changes to the VIP system. (Image:

A second PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently failing woefully to make a dent that is discernible at least on the internet site’s traffic numbers.

Around 1,600 players subscribed to the protest, according to organizers.

The previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same day the previous week per industry number-cruncher, while traffic dipped on January 1st, the first day of the strike, it actually rose on January 2nd, in comparison with the same day.

Of course, it’s impossible to understand just how much the dearth that is sudden of stakes players is affecting PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players who pledged to stay out have in truth proved real to their word.

The boycott, which is due to get rid of Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by a number of groups including and, along with a range high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards an overhaul that is major the VIP system, which took effect on January 1st.

PokerStars announced in November that these changes would consist of scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement of this status being a process that is two-year.

Boycott Backfired?

PokerStars claims that the changes are designed to improve the poker ecology, but they leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.

While these players represent a number of your website’s most avid, long-term, and high-ranking players, they are net-withdrawing players rather than the hordes of net-depositors that the online poker giant is anxious to attract.

The first boycott took place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that event clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic figures remained similar, except that those high-stakes players were changed with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot awards.

While PokerStars is likely to have raked less during that period, it declared itself vindicated by the December boycott.

‘During the boycott that is three-day recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem link between the season with steady net gaming revenue, even though our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they have all year,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.

More Boycotts Planned

The players that are affected undeterred, nonetheless, and are determined showing PokerStars they can make the operator’s life hard.

And more boycotts are planned in the future. has launched a campaign looking for 5,000 signatures to accept at the very least a month-long strike, while other protestors have recommended that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by as much as 30 percent.

On New Year’s Day, Ike Haxton became the second high-profile PokerStars Pro to resign in disgust at the modifications, following example of Alex Millar, whom severed ties with the site just before the getaway period.

‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I understand what it requires to rake 1M VPP in a year,’ published haxton on 2+2. ‘It’s a tough grind. For most of the players that do it, it is a commitment that is all-consuming intense than most regular jobs.

‘Many of these have actually relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he included. ‘Finding out, just as you expected them to be is brutal as you approach the finish line, that your efforts will not be rewarded. I cannot in good conscience carry on to endorse a poker site that treats its players this real way.’

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.